您当前的位置:首页 > 主题内容 > 临床麻醉 > 专家评述
七氟烷预处理对心肺转流术患者围术期血浆 细胞因子和粘附分子表达的影响 [Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of sevoflurane preconditioning on plasma tumor necrosis factor(TNF)-a, interleukin(IL)-6, 8, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) [Key words] Sevoflurane; Preconditioning; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Cytokines; Cell adhesion molecules 1986年Murry等[1]首次提出缺血预处理(IPC)的概念,有关预处理的研究日渐增多。有研究显示,挥发性麻醉药也具有与缺血预处理相仿的机制,使心肌梗死范围减小,产生心肌保护作用,这种现象称为“挥发性麻醉药预处理”(APC)[2],目前它已成为麻醉学研究的热点。七氟烷是一种新型卤族氟类吸入麻醉药,目前临床上广泛使用。研究表明,七氟烷预处理对心肌缺血再灌注损伤具有心肌保护作用[3,4],另有研究发现其对缺血再灌注大鼠心肌的保护作用与抑制炎症介质有关[5],七氟烷预处理对心肺转流心内直视手术患者心肌的保护作用是否也与抑制炎症介质有关尚未定论。本研究通过对肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白介素(IL)-6,8、细胞粘附分子(ICAM)-1浓度的测定, 从炎性反应的角度, 探讨七氟烷预处理在心肺转流心内直视手术中对心肌保护作用的可能机制,为其临床应用提供参考。 资料与方法 择期心肺转流心内直视术患者30例,男13例,女17例,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,年龄18~56岁,体重31~ 麻醉前30 min肌肉注射咪达唑仑0.1 mg/kg及东莨菪碱0.2~0.3 mg。入室后建立静脉通路,DATEX- S/5监护仪(Ohmeda公司,美国)监测心电图(ECG),脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2),局麻下行桡动脉穿刺置管持续监测平均动脉压(MAP),右颈内静脉置管监测中心静脉压(CVP)。依次缓慢静脉注射咪达唑仑0.1 mg kg-1, 芬太尼5~7 μg kg-1及维库溴铵0.15 mg kg-1行麻醉诱导气管插管,连接NARKOMED GS麻醉机( North American Drager公司,美国)行机械通气,维持PETCO2 35~40 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133kPa),术中和CPB期间以芬太尼3~5 μg kg-1 h-1、丙泊酚5 mg kg-1 h-1和维库溴铵0.12 mg kg-1 h-1维持麻醉和肌松,根据MAP、HR的变化调整药物剂量。肝素化后建立CPB,使用SⅢ型体外循环机器(Stockert公司,德国)和Dideco膜肺(Sorin公司,意大利)。心脏停跳采用主动脉根部灌注 S组在手术开始至心肺转流前吸入浓度为2%的七氟烷(1.2MAC)(批号:5Y18 丸石制药株式会社,日本)20 min,随后给以10 min洗脱期,而C组只吸入纯氧,其余麻醉处理相同。 分别于麻醉诱导前即刻(T0)、主动脉开放后10 min(T1)、CPB结束即刻(T2)、4 h(T3)、24 h(T4)采桡动脉血4ml,经低温离心( 统计学处理 采用SPSS13.0统计软件进行统计分析,计量资料以均数±标准差(±s)表示,组内比较采用重复测量数据的方差分析,组间比较采用t检验;计数资料采用χ2检验。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结 果 两组患者年龄、性别比、体重、手术种类构成比、CPB时间、主动脉阻断时间及最低鼻咽温度比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),见表1。 与T0时比较,两组T1-4TNF-α、ICAM-1、IL-6、IL-8、 CK-MB及cTnI浓度均增高(P<0.05 或<0.01);与C组比较,S组 TNF-α、IL-6,8浓度T1-4时均降低(P<0.05或<0.01), ICAM-1、CK-MB、cTnI浓度T2-4时降低(P<0.05 或<0.01),见表2 。 参考文献 1 Murry CE, 2 Wolfgang G, Kersten JR. Isoflurane preconditioning myocardium against infarction via activation of inhibitiory guanine nucleotide binding proteins. Anesthesiology, 2000,92: 1400-1408. 3 Obal D, Dettwiler S, Favoccia C, et al. The influence of mitochondrial KATP-channels in the cardioprotection of preconditioning and postconditioning by sevoflurane in the rat in vivo. Anesth Analg, 2005, 101: 1252-1260. 4 Kato R, Foex P. Myocardial protection by anesthetic agents against ischemia-reperfusion injury: an update for anesthesiologists. Can J Anesth, 2002, 49: 777-791. 5 Plachinta RV, Hayes JK, Cerilli LA, et al. Isoflurane pretreatment inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in rats. Anesthesiology, 2003, 98:89-95. 6 kawamura T, Kadosaki M, Nara N, et al. Effects of sevoflurane on cytokine balance in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2006, 20:503-508. 7 De Hert SG, Philippe J, Cromheeche S, et al. Choice of primary anesthetic regimen can influence intensive care unit length of stay after coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.Anesthiology, 2004, 101: 9-30. 8 Nader ND, Li CM, Khadra WZ, et al. Anesthetic myocardial protection with sevoflurane. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2004, 18:269-274. 9 Krown KA, Yasui K, Brooker MJ, et al. TNF alpha receptor expression in rat cardiac myocytes:TNF alpha inhibition of L-type Ca2+ current and Ca2+ transients. FEBS Lett, 1995, 27,376:24-30. 10 Sawa Y,Ichikawa H,Kagisaki K, et al.Interleukin-6 derived from hypoxic myocytes neutrophil-mediated reperfusion injury in myocardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1998, 116:511-517. 11 Kawamura T, Wakusawa R, Okada K, et al. Elevation of cytokines during open heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: Participation of interleukin 8 and 12 Takesa S, Nakanishi K, Ikezaki H, et al. Cardiac marker responses to coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamping. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2002, 16: 421-425. 13 Missov E, Calzolaric Pan B. Circulating cardiac troponin Iin severe congestive heart failure.Circulation, 1997,96: 2953-2958. |
|
|