您当前的位置:首页 > 主题内容 > 临床麻醉 > 专家评述
Clinical study and long term evaluation of immunomodulation therapy on trauma, severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome patients HUANG Shun wei, GUAN Xiang dong, CHEN Juan, OU YANG Bin. Surgery Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China Methods Prospective, randomized, blind and controlled clinical analysis of 70 patients conforming to the enrolled standard was carried out. They were divided into two groups at random. One was control group (n=34) with regular therapy, and the treatment group (n=36) with ulinastatin plus thymosinα1 on the base of regular therapy for 1 week. The immunological indexes were determined before and after therapy on the 1 st, 3 rd, 7 th, 14 th and 28 th day, including the changes in lymphocyte count, CD14+ monocytes human leukocyte antigen (locus) DR (HLADR), clinical data and long term follow up. Results During hospitalization, 20 patients died in the control group and 13 patients died in the treatment group. There was significant difference between two groups (P<0.05=. After 7 up to 28 days of therapy, the counts of lymphocyte and CD14+ monocytes HLADR were significantly higher than those in control group (all P<0.05=. The duration of using mechanical ventilation and pressor agent in the treatment group were shorter than those in the control group (both P<0.01). The length of stay and the cost in the intensive care unit (ICU) were not significantly increased in the treatment group (both P>0.05). The long term survival time in the treatment group was much longer than that in the control group (P<0.05=. Conclusions Immunomodulation therapy can improve the prognosis of trauma, severe sepsis and MODS patients in a period of 28 days of observation, and lymphocyte counts and CD14+ monocytes HLADR were increased significantly, showing that immunosuppression can be ameliorated. Immunomodulation therapy can shorten the time of mechanical ventilation and the use of pressor agent, and it does not increase the length of stay and the cost in ICU, and therefore the cost effectiveness is high. It also can prolong the longterm survival time. The results show that immunomodulation therapy is one of successful therapeutic strategies in the care of critical illness. 【Key words】trauma;severe sepsis;multiple organ dysfunction syndrome;immunomodulation therapy 1.3 观察指标:观察治疗前及治疗后1、3、7、14和28 d淋巴细胞计数和CD14+单核细胞人白细胞DR抗原(HLADR)水平的动态变化。以28 d为观察时间,判断患者预后转归情况。以2005年9月为随访观察终点,“+”表示仍然生存。 2.3 两组临床资料和生存分析的比较(表1,图3):在ICU治疗期间,治疗组患者机械通气和使用升压药的时间均较对照组明显缩短(P均<0.01);治疗组患者ICU住院时间和费用无显著增加(P均>0.05)。随访期间的观察结果显示:治疗组存活率为63.9%,平均生存时间为342 d,标准误为47 d,95%的可信区间为250~434 d;而对照组存活率为41.1%,平均生存时间为245 d,标准误为50 d,95%的可信区间为147~343 d;治疗组远期生存时间较对照组明显延长(P<0.05)。 3 讨论 从20世纪80年代中期至90年代中期,对脓毒症的大规模临床抗炎治疗研究由于未取得预期结果而被宣布失败,反思其原因在于不能把握疾病发生、发展规律,于是Bone等〔4〕提出代偿性抗炎反应综合征(CARS)假说。但基础研究表明,机体的“免疫麻痹”比单纯的全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和CARS更常见〔6,7〕,逆转“免疫麻痹”有望提高生存率,如果对此类患者同时实施免疫调理治疗,理论上合理。国内对此问题的认识和研究刚开始,还缺乏临床研究资料,而本研究力图弥补这方面的不足。 当前监测危重患者免疫学指标的方法有很多,但能够定量地被使用的方法只有淋巴细胞计数和CD14+单核细胞HLADR水平的检测〔8,9〕。本研究采用动态观察患者淋巴细胞计数和CD14+单核细胞HLADR水平变化来推测免疫调理治疗的效果。与既往同类研究的不同之处在于:①治疗药物的选择为免疫调理治疗,不单一用药;②治疗时间窗的动态观察由治疗前延续至治疗后28 d,有远期随访。 乌司他丁是从人尿液中提取精制而成的糖蛋白,存在多种酶的结合位点,能独立抑制多种酶的活性。近来研究表明,它不仅仅影响危重症患者的细胞因子水平,而且还具有抑制氧自由基生成,稳定溶酶体膜,改善微循环和组织灌注及减少再灌注损伤等作用,从而降低重症患者的病死率〔10〕。国内不乏对其的研究,但往往只是探讨高危患者单独使用乌司他丁进行抗炎治疗对炎症因子的影响,而对免疫系统的影响知之甚少。 胸腺肽α1作为免疫增强剂具有作用点高和作用范围广的优点,且安全和便宜。国内林洪远等〔9〕亦有类似的研究表明,胸腺5肽(TP5)可能对逆转免疫抑制有效,但需要严格的对照治疗研究确认,故暂时还不能完全确认胸腺肽治疗的有效性。 15 Kobayashi H,Suzuki M,Tanaka Y,et al.Suppression of urokinase expression and invasiveness by urinary trypsin inhibitor is mediated through inhibition of protein kinase Cand MEK/ERK/cJundependent signaling pathways〔J〕.J Biol Chem,2001,276:20152022. 16 Oberholzer A,Oberholzer C,Minter R M,et al.Considering immunomodulatory therapies in the septic patient:should apoptosis be a potential therapeutic target〔J〕?Immunol Lett,2001,75:221224. 17 Jiang X,Kim H E,Shu H,et al.Distinctive roles of PHAP proteins and prothymosinalpha in a death regulatory pathway〔J〕.Science,2003,299:223226. 18代静泓,邱海波,杨毅,等.1991—2001年ICU严重感染的流行病学调查分析〔J〕.中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2003,2:114118. 19 Benjamim C F,Hogaboam C M,Kunkel S L.The chronic consequences of severe sepsis〔J〕.J Leukoc Biol,2004,75:408412. 20 Slade E,Tamber P S,Vincent J L.The surviving sepsis campaign:raising awareness to reduce mortality〔J〕.Crit Care,2003,7:12. |
|
|