Page 12 - 麻醉与监护论坛2015年第3期
P. 12

Cover Thesis

group (33 cases) (Table 1). Of all the 135 cases, there were:                                    correlation between them (Table 4). The expression
49 cases with pneumonia, 23 cases with multiple trauma,                                          of proET-1 is significantly associated with the clinical
14 cases with peritonitis, 13 cases with pancreatitis, 8                                         efficacy.
cases with enteritis, 7 cases with infection of oral and
soft tissue, 6 cases with cholecystitis, 6 cases with sepsis,                                        The relationship between infection score and
3 cases with urinary tract infection, 2 cases with rupture                                       clinical efficacy
of esophagus, 1 case with meningitis, 1 case lung abscess,
1case liver abscess, and 1 case diabetic acidosis. A total                                            The infection score had the same trend in the three
of 184 strains were isolated from the patients, which                                            groups. The healing group had the lowest infection
included: staphylococcus aureus (include MRSA) 46,                                               score, while the unimproved group the highest (Table 5)
acinetobacter 29, bacilli coli 27, pseudomonas aeruginosa                                        (p<0.0001). Statistical tests showed significant differences
24, klebsiella 23, enterococcus 12, enterobacter cloacae                                         among the three groups (Table 6). It showed that with
4, stenotrophomonas maltophilia 6, streptococcus 3,                                              the improvement of the disease and the infection under
burkholderia cepacia 3, corynebacterium 2, indole                                                control, the infection score dropped whereas the score
bacillus 2, xylose oxidation of alcaligenes 1, catarrhalis 1,                                    increased in the unimproved group. The Spearman’s
and serratia 1.                                                                                  correlation coefficient between infection score and clinical
                                                                                                 efficacy was 0.283, (p<0.0001), which indicated that there
    AThe relationship between proET-1 level and                                                  was a positive correlation between them (Table 7). The
clinical efficacy                                                                                infection score was also significantly correlated with the
                                                                                                 clinical response.
     The outcomes of proET-1 content in three groups are
shown on Table 2. The proET-1 content was the highest                                                The relationship between infection score and
in the unimproved group and the lowest in the healing                                            proET-1
group. (p<0.0001) The difference was significant (Table
3). It also showed that the content of proET-1 in the three                                           Statistical tests showed significant differences
groups varied with the clinical efficacy. The Spearman’s                                         between the infection score and proET-1. The correlation
correlation coefficient between proET-1 and clinical                                             coefficient between them was 0.200 (p<0.0001) (Table 8).
efficacy is 0.175 (p<0.0001), which indicates a positive                                         There was a positive correlation between them.

Table 7 The correlation between infection score and clinical                                        DISCUSSION

efficacy.                                                                                             Endothelin 1 is the most abundant member of the
                                                                                                 family of endothelins. It was separated, purified and
                         Efficacy     Correlation Coefficient  Efficacy         Infection Score  named by Yanagisawa in 1988. It is the most potent
Spearman's rho                             Sig. (2-tailed)      1.000               0.283**      endogenous peptide ever discovered, causing contraction
                                                  N                                  0.000       of respiratory smooth muscle, strengthening myocardial
                     Infection Score                             977                   974       contractility, and stimulating proliferation of trachea and
                                      Correlation Coefficient  0.283**               1.000       vascular smooth muscle fibers. It can also inhibit renin
                                           Sig. (2-tailed)      0.000                            release, stimulate cardiac atrium cells to release atrial
                                                  N                                    974       natriuretic factor, and stimulate blood vessels to release
                                                                 974                             endothelium derived relaxing factor [5]. ET-1 is involved
                                                                                                 in a number of physiological and pathological processes
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).                                      including the vascular changes associated with sepsis [6-
                                                                                                 9]. ET-1 originates from a larger precursor peptide (pre-
Table 8 Comparison of infection score and proET-1 in three

groups.

                     Infection Score  Correlation Coefficient  Infection Score  ProET-1
Spearman's rho                             Sig. (2-tailed)          1.000       0.200**
                                                  N                              0.000
                         ProET-1                                      974
                                      Correlation Coefficient      0.200**        964
                                           Sig. (2-tailed)          0.000        1.000
                                                  N
                                                                      964         967

                                      Laboratory and Clinical CInovveesrtiTghaetisoins           20 FAM 2013 Jan/Feb Vol.20 Issue 1
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17